The working group report on science-based categories for abstracts: submitted to the annual scientific sessions. American Heart Association.

نویسندگان

  • R O Bonow
  • G A Mensah
  • M A Bettmann
  • G H Gibbons
  • A O Grant
  • J Jalife
  • R M Robertson
چکیده

A primary mission of the Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association (AHA) is to attract the best new and emerging science from a wide spectrum of established and new investigators worldwide. The AHA also seeks to promote the missions of its scientific councils (Table 1) by fostering interaction and collaboration between new and old members as well as non-members participating in the scientific sessions. In order to facilitate submission of abstracts for presentation at the scientific sessions and to enable a fair review and grading of submitted abstracts, the Committee on Scientific Sessions Program (CSSP) and the Council Affairs Committee (CAC) formed the subcommittee on ScienceBased Abstract Review and charged it with the responsibility of reviewing the abstract grading process. Membership of the subcommittee included previous CSSP Program Chairs and representatives from the CSSP and CAC. On its recommendation, a working group of the CSSP was formed and directed to make specific recommendations for the revised abstract category list. This report reflects the revisions made by the Working Group on Science-Based Abstract Categories as approved by the CSSP on January 15, 1998. A total of 85 unique categories were created within the three broad bases of (a) basic research, (b) clinical science and (c) population science (Tables 2 and 3). Reviewers for each category are selected from a broad base of national and international expert members of AHA scientific councils. Non-members of scientific councils with national and international recognition for their expertise in relevant categories may also be included in the panel of abstract reviewers. Tables 4a and 4b show the list of scientific councils and the categories for which they provide sponsorship and reviewers. Each abstract is graded by 7–10 reviewers to provide a fair and comprehensive review. The abstract category list will be revised yearly by the CSSP in order to reflect the changing field of science and to continue to capture the best new and emerging data from the frontiers of basic research, clinical science and population-based science. TABLE 1. Scientific Councils of the American Heart Association

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

70th Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association.

The 70th Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association were attended by 37,000 people, including 21,000 medical professionals. Out of 13,103 submissions, 4,300 abstracts were selected for presentation at this conference. The abstracts have been published in a supplement to Circulation (Volume 96, Number 8).

متن کامل

Highlights of the 2009 scientific sessions of the European Society of Cardiology.

a p f a 3 t s he annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology ESC) was held in Barcelona, Spain, August 29 to Septemer 2, 2009. The total attendance was 31,323 participants rom 136 different countries. Excellent congress facilities osted 237 pre-arranged sessions in 30 meeting rooms unning in parallel, including several joint sessions in ollaboration with other societies (e.g., the Ame...

متن کامل

Awards and named lecturers at the American Heart Association 71st scientific sessions.

The 71st Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association were held in Dallas, Tex, November 8 through 11, 1998. A traditional highlight of the annual AHA Scientific Sessions is the recognition of excellence in clinical and basic cardiovascular research via the Scientific Councils’ distinguished lectureships, awards, and Young Investigator competitions. The awardees and nominees for these ...

متن کامل

The Third Columbus Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and Associated Societies.

.............................................................................. 101 Agriculture (0 .......................................................................................... 122 G eneral Sessions ........................................................................................ 102 Edu ation ( ) ..................................................................................

متن کامل

Reporting quality of submissions to the National Conferences on Electronic Learning in Medical Education: implications from Iranian research performance

Background: Reporting quality of research on medical education has come under scrutiny in recent years in wake of empirical evidence. Poor reporting quality of published abstracts may distract readers from careful reading of research evidence or in a worst case mislead scientists. Main objective of this study was to evaluate the extent and quality of the submitted abstracts to the 3rd and 4th N...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Circulation research

دوره 82 7  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1998